Words, Wisdom and Nonsense
« June 2003 »
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30
You are not logged in. Log in
Entries by Topic
All topics  «
Blog Tools
Edit your Blog
Build a Blog
RSS Feed
View Profile
Thursday, 19 June 2003
In The Beginning
The human race came to fruition when they developed the capability to manipulate words as tools. This probably happened between 35,000 and 70,000 years ago.

One of the first things we did with our new tools was to ask questions. It didn't matter that some of the questions had no answers or were constructed so that any answer would be meaningless or just wrong. We invented answers anyway.

Refusing to admit that our answers were inventions, we claimed they came from divine authorities, the gods. Those who had invented different answers made the same claim. We killed each other to justify the divine origins of our answer sets. We called that religion.

One important question was where we go when we die. Somebody decided that our breath, inspiration or spirit carried on much as we had in life, an idea that proved so popular it was borrowed by many religions. Religions might differ in opinion as to whether that spirit went to a happy place, a place of suffering or just wandered invisibly about this world, thereby justifying more strife.

Use of the new tool gave us an advantage for survival. Educating the young in survival techniques was easier and more thorough. Dangers could be described without having to be seen. Experience could be carried over several generations. New techniques could spread rapidly over vast territories.

Those who learned to speak soon learned to decorate their bodies with jewelry, a new invention that spread quickly over trade routes that sprung up. Carvings appeared and, deep in unlighted caves, art was created on the walls. If the art was used in initiations, itself a form of magical invocation, and magic for curing, hunting and harvest, the true magic is that it developed into pictographs that became writing.

Writing solidified words, not just by giving them permanence in media like clay tablets. Because the written word lasts a long time, we can see how our spoken words have drifted in sound and meaning from the way they were a few decades or centuries before. We can also note from contexts that the meanings of particular words shifts, often reversing completely. Spoken language is as fluid as the air it floats on and as impermanent as its speakers while written language will outlast its creators.

By its relative permanence, written language has become a standard for the spoken language. Writing has brought formality to the once casual process of communicating.

Posted by wordjames at 3:39 PM PDT
Post Comment | View Comments (2) | Permalink

Thursday, 19 June 2003 - 10:30 PM PDT

Name: Spot
Home Page: http://www.xanga.com/Spotthecat1

I would imagine that spending time with you would round out my education; we'd have wonderful conversations about every topic under the sun...and I'm also sure that we'd have lots of things to disagree about. Although our 'world views' differ, I'm always intrigued by your 'take' on things and am sure that it would be a challenge to try and win an argument.
I guess my disagreement here stems from the source of the answers. No amount of emperical data could be used to support my idea that indeed some answers are inspired by the Divine. I think it would be a really lively discussion though.
I'm glad you figured out that 'instant updates' don't work anymore...
~Spot~

Tuesday, 19 August 2003 - 6:13 PM PDT

Name: James / Am
Home Page: http://www.xanga.com/Am0

I don't consider that arguments have to be won or lost to have value.

All too often, apparent disagreements dissolve when it is discovered that the parties are either operating on different levels or using their vocabulary is slightly different ways.

For example, my comments about humans developing a capacity for religion and religious experience at the same point in their development that they developed the capacity for language says absolutely nothing about any religion. It does not affirm the possible truth of any religion, nor does it deny it. It does not even discuss that question.

Before humans developed language, they were incapable of giving expression to spirituality. Since the development of language, expressions of spirituality have become highly elaborated and have, in fact, been shown to contribute to our survival as a species. That still says nothing of the substance of religion, which is what interests most people.

I don't want to get distracted by an argument about whose religion is right or true. Those arguments don't interest me. I've made my own observations on the matter and decided many years ago that I prefer not to discuss my feelings in this area. I may eventually convey my opinions to a select few -- but I also may not, depending on how I feel.

So I would say that we have no basic disagreement, only a misunderstanding about the limits about what I will discuss. I will talk about language and the human race but not about the possible existance of the divine.

View Latest Entries